Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Throughout history, teacher has played a prominent role in all societies. Due to it is paramount importance of influence the teachers on the students. A controversial question which is often raised this idea about whether the educators ought to speak about the own view about political with their pupils. Some people may hold the view that the teachers must discussion about the social events with the pupils, and the teachers can share their point of view with the students. However, some other people may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that educators do not allow speak to their children about the social problems, and they do not influence on the perspective of the children. I personally content that teachers do not need to sharing their idea about social and political events; therefore, I agree with this proposal. In the following paragraphs, I will delve in to the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite factors to be mentioned is that the educators ought not to speak about their social and political point of view with the pupils; because the pupils are so small for analyzing the events. To elaborate on my point, since the students do not have the information about political, the teachers do not speak with them about this perspective. In other words, if the teacher tries to show that own viewpoint is correct, the pupils would make problem with this view in which different with the view of their parents. Also, I think it makes unfavorable effects on the children characters so that the teachers do not speak about politics and social events. A significant example that strikes in my mind about my younger brother. He is 10 years old and now studying at elementary school. The teachers spoke with them about politics in the classes; thus, they could not analyze this issue, and it makes negative effects on them.
In addition, I assert that the students need to learn some important ability such as make superior life, cooking, suitable connection with other people, and many other similar abilities rather than know about perspective of their teachers about social and politics view of point. In other words, the teachers must learn to the children how better living, and the educators show to the children aspect of exceptional life. When the teachers speak with the pupils about the excellent experience in their life not only they make benefit effect on the children but also they schooling some skill to them. Owing to having overwhelm effect on the children, the educators can promote and provoke the pupils for trying to make triumph life. Thus, character the students are made by teachers.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that the educators should not make their perspective on the children. I believe that children are so small to analyses political events, and they need learn demanded kill of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | naziii | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | shrijan | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 785, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cter the students are made by teachers. To wrap it up, all the aforementioned re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, i think, in addition, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2417.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99380165289 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5583710536 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435950413223 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7157915954 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.095238095 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0476190476 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272780022838 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927742038592 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616437634704 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179976821251 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443143164191 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.