Should the government help the homeless?
The phenomenon of homeless people is increasing in unprecedented rate nowadays. Regardless of causes of this phenomenon, it affects societies in a very bad way. In my opinion governments should work hard to find houses for these people for the following reasons.
It is in the favor of the country that governments provide houses and jobs for the homeless and poor people. They are humans, and have the same needs as other people. If jobs weren’t provided for them, they will search for illegal jobs to make living. These illegal jobs have negative effect on the countries themselves. On the other hand, governments can invest in them. They don’t like the way they live, and are willing to attain respected jobs. However, there are priorities, they can’t search for such a job, while they can’t find homes.
Conversely, letting these people to live in streets their ways, will have bad consequences. The streets will no longer be safe as crime rates will increase. Robbery cases will increase as a result of being after money in any possible way. It is worth mentioning that the other way is full of problems too. The government will pay huge amount of money to provide homes for these people. Moreover, most of these people are not educated, thus government should also give them required education to compete in job market. As a matter of fact, if governments helped these people, they can get their money back in the form of beneficial projects held by these homeless people.
In conclusions, I strongly believe that it is more useful to help homeless people to find places to live in. They want to make a living, so it is either governments aid them to find homes and jobs, or they will do that themselves.
- importance of telling the truth 70
- we have to be creative in order to succeed either in school or at work 65
- which is better, group or personal problem solving? 70
- In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explor 65
- Should the government help the homeless? 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 297.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86531986532 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62863141036 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5002036818 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.0526315789 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6315789474 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210778908303 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065617868556 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762208879046 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144729239096 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448946999391 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.