The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The three circle graphs illustrate annual expenditure variations in a British educational institution in three sample years of 1981, 1991 and 2001. Overall, teachers’ salaries were the major budgetary item, while insurance accounted for the lowest outlay; meanwhile, spending on other wages, resources and equipment fluctuated significantly.
Starting with staff payments, teachers’ salaries stood at 40% of budget in 1981, rose to 50% in 1991, then declined slightly to 45% in 2001. Payments to support workers, on the other hand, started the period at 28%, fell to 22% in 1991, and further declined to 15% in the final year of the study.
Turning now to other budgetary items, educational resources fluctuated from 15% in the first year to 20% in the second, then dropped to a low of 9% at the close of the study. Furniture and equipment costs, on the other hand, dropped at first from 15% in 1981 to 5% in 1991, then ballooned to 23% by the end of the period. Insurance, always the smallest item of expenditure, was as low as 2% and 3% in 1981 and 1991 respectively, but jumped to 8% in 2001
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the followings statement? Teachers’ performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers. 73
- A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas What problems might this difference cause How might these problems be reduced 84
- In many cities, planners have separated schools, homes, shops and offices into specific areas which are widely separated from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages for city residents? 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87830687831 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89673721206 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 20.7492316061 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166139577581 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086214195547 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748985243376 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118386936494 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427824740169 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.