The more money people have, the more money they should give away to charity
There are some moot points about donating to charity, the question of which people should give away much money to charity has aroused as a subject of controversy among authorities. Everyone has their own zeitgeist. When it comes to my position, I strongly subscribe to the point that people should help to charity toward their asset.
I have some reasons, two of which will be explicated hereunder
The first reason worth discussing here is that wealthy people who have more income can help charity without any difficulties because they have more money and they have any inadequately. Rich people never feel solicitude about their future, therefore, they can give more payment to charity. To be more specific, in comparison to mediate people wealthy people have more ability to donate charity consequently, society expects much money from people of higher class.
As a case in the point, I vividly know many celebrities and famous person who have more income have their own charity and donate money in the volunteer manner. These people not only encourage others to donate but also invest more money for helping. To be more specific I know a football player who has some charities organization and helps frequently to these charities. My personal experience competently corroborates this idea that rich people can help much money to penniless people.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned is that people who earn much money should pay more taxes thus there are some rules in many countries that encourage these kinds of person to instead of paying for taxes they can help to charities as much as they can. In order to strict rules in taking taxes, the more money people earn, the more taxes people pay consequently, wealthy persons tend to give much money in charities and take discount toward their taxes. My personal experience demonstrates this reality, my neighbor is a rich man who has many shopping stores in the downtown. He incomes more currencies from his leaseholder, therefore, he should pay more taxes in respect to this money. I know he accepts to establish some charity organization in order to help children with cancer diseases. In return for this action, he exempts from paying taxes. My own experience shed some light of the point that it is better for rich persons to helping more money to charities and take more discounts from their taxes.
In the nutshell, wealthy people should help much money to the charities because these kinds of people not only have any inadequately but also can take some exempt for their taxes in order to donate much money to the charity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-15 | mrhj75 | 75 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | abusrddddd | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | abusrddddd | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-19 | Rustin_Panda | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | reeya kiran | 70 | view |
- Tpo 50 3
- A company is going to give some money either to support arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? 73
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?- An organization that provides food and housing to people i 73
- What are some important characteristics of a co-worker? 66
- TPO46-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'charities'' or 'charity's'?
Suggestion: charities'; charity's
...c I know a football player who has some charities organization and helps frequently to th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94772727273 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52632319474 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415909090909 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6964074423 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.944444444 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.53313303996 0.236089414692 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192965551085 0.076458572812 252% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123842698439 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294494413182 0.150856017488 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145716583781 0.0645574589148 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.