Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Almost every feature of our societies offer chances to carry on a plethora of different researches. While it is to be considered shrewd that in some of these matters, such as social sciences, it is crucial for governments to guide the researchers through a certain number of restrictions, it is also clear that in some other areas, such as medicine and pherhaps space exploration, research agencies need greater freedom.
Medicine has always been a field of flourishing success in humans' research history, bringing us to deal with the worst unimaginable deseases and preventing endemic and noxious pandemies like sifilis or tubercolosis from eradicating our kind. Unfortunately, specifically in this era of capitalization and strong industrialization, medical research is strictly checked by the necessities of an economical income. Consider farmaceutical industry: it has to cope with demanding mechanisms of offer/request and this, by itself, hinders the process of discovering new cures for uncommon deseases (researches for a desease that is rare is seen, of course, as a waste of time). It would be a shame to put even further restrictions on this uncontrovertibly necessary field of science: governments could limit fundings and expect researchers to follow some specific ruled directions, but this would clearly wind up in poorer results. Aligning to this reasoning chain, given that medical research is pivotal and momentous to follow the positive trend in the fighting of our desease we have always had, government restriction would only bring crucial disadvantages to our kind.
The same argument can be propoused for research in space exploration, but slightly differently. In fact, space exploration is an arrestingly funding demanding activity that not only involves important amounts of money and international collaborations, but can also lead to unnecessary wastes and erring policies. For instance, the greatest space agencies in the world are actually public (namely Nasa in America, Esa in Europe, Isa in Italy, Roskomos in Russia): basically, they expect to be funded and subscribed by the nations they lean on. Thus, if it is true that also in this field researchers need to be free from heavy economical or law necessities, it is consistent to deem that space exploration should be regulated by the nations above named so that agencies do not spend too much in researces that would not achieve any important or useful discovery.
On the other side, some sciences can easily fall in some sort of flawed systems: specifically, some univerities and laboratories are leaded by pundits that keep on unconclusive researching paths, thus preventing science to go further in other directions. In this particular occurrence, governmetns should consider their pivotal role in the control over unproductive activities. Social sciences researches, for example, more often end up deepening areas of knowledge that, apparently, have no use for a nation or for the funders: government restrictions would undoubtedly avoid this sort of waste and would let sciences shift to more promising subjects.
As higlighted in this essay, the author of the sentence holds true but only in specific circumstances. It is in fact necessary to make sure that researchers and agencies are monitored as to prevent excessive wastes and unconcluding thesis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Relannian newspaper Industry analysts report that the number of dairy farms in Relanna has increased by 25 percent over the last decade Also recent innovations in milking technology make it possible fo 81
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 66
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 66
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. 79
- The following appeared in a newsletter to Canbury’s residents from the president ofPlexma Motors.“I am pleased to announce that Plexma’s new manufacturing site is on schedule to opennext year. In addition to our regular line of cars, Plexma has also 27
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, but, if, so, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, of course, sort of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2833.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41682600382 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19521576049 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550669216061 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 893.7 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.2090585778 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.0625 118.986275619 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6875 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.21951772744 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130570973696 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432166750497 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325623722187 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702698879872 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285711689482 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 14.1392134831 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 48.8420337079 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.