The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts describe how a particular UK school spent money every year in the three years of 1981, 1991, and 2001. Overall, expenditure on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment showed an upward trend during the twenty years, while that on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books a downward trend; also teachers’ payment always topped the charts in these years.
Starting with the group with an upward trend, a significant rise in the spending can be seen in teachers’ salaries from 45% in 1981 to 50% in 2001, with a peak at 50% in 1991. Meanwhile, the amount of money on furniture and equipment increased from 15% to 23%, with a great dip at 5% in 1991. The two decades also witnessed a growth in insurance from 2% to 8%.
However, during the twenty years the expense on other workers’ salaries experienced a decrease from 28% to 15%. The twenty years saw a drop in resources e.g. books from 15% to 9%, with a peak at 20% in 1991.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical health services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages? 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050 80
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77906976744 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84762670058 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8008068296 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182431678513 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888908572482 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131090504971 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117984195777 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914503551062 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.