The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts describe how a particular UK school spent money every year in the three years of 1981, 1991, and 2001. Overall, expenditure on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment showed an upward trend during the twenty years, while that on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books a downward trend.
Starting with insurance, teachers’ salaries and furniture and equipment, there was an increase in expense in the twenty years. A significant rise in the spending can be seen in teachers’ salaries from 45% in 1981 to 50% in 2001, with a peak at 50% in 1991. Meanwhile, the amount of money on furniture and equipment increased from 15% to 23%, with a great dip at 5% in 1991. The two decades also witnessed a growth in insurance from 2% to 8%.
However, during the twenty years the expense on other workers’ salaries experienced a decrease from 28% to 15%. The twenty years saw a drop in resources e.g. books from 15% to 9%, with a peak at 20% in 1991.
Throughout the twenty years, teachers’ payment always accounted for the largest proportion, while insurance occupied the smallest. The percentage of resources such as books was equal to that of furniture and equipment in 1981 but similar to that of other workers’ salaries in 1991.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 84
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 89
- Some people argue that the fittest and strongest individuals and teams can achieve the greatest success in sports. But other people think the success is much related to the mental attitude. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., however, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01382488479 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01217559404 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502304147465 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3224477298 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160053242562 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711865200882 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116930267796 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104661290077 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934450005477 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.