Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
there is an opinion that students in high school should compulsorily participate in unpaid community services. Although there may be some merits, I totally disagree with this proposal for it do not rationally consider the feasibility and morality.
The principal reason is that it is not feasible to organise all the high school students to provide unpaid community services. The number of students is too large, compared with the number of positions; thus, they may impact the operation of , for example, charities, local schools or non-government organisations. Moreover, the students may not follow the guidence of their teachers or managers, bringing troubles to the local communities.rt
A more important reason why I oppose this policy is that students also have the right to choose their works even if they are immature. Basically, there are thousands of ways in the world for them to contuibute; some examples are to be scientists, managers or manufacturers, instead of to be social workers only. if students want to work in areas highly different from community service, they would be disappoiting to be managed to work for a charity or a primary school. In this case, this policy is merely wasting their time and exploiting their labour [, given that it is unpaid.
In conclusion, I completely disagree with the opinion to set the unpaid community service to be a compulsory programme in high school. this is because not only this proposal is not tactful and may do harm to community, but also it is morally wrong.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Sohaib270 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Mihir Rami | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries. 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there is an opinion that students in high sch...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...; thus, they may impact the operation of , for example, charities, local schools o...
^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
..., instead of to be social workers only. if students want to work in areas highly d...
^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
... their time and exploiting their labour [, given that it is unpaid. In conclus...
^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... a compulsory programme in high school. this is because not only this proposal is no...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11155378486 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9340152841 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537848605578 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7258132787 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.3 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265126632681 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117782813002 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833827802087 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174777566965 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534119369431 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.