Some people argue that the fittest and strongest individuals and teams can achieve the greatest success in sports. But other people think the success is much related to the mental attitude. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, many hold the view that the strongest sports players can gain the first prize in matches. However, there is a body of opinion which holds that positive mental attitude influences the final results of games. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that people who are physically strongest can easily achieve the greatest success, since sports require players to have strength. In this way, those who are tallest or fittest can easily defeat those who are not. For example, James, the most successful basketball player in the world, enjoys advantages in height and strength. In addition, every team member who is the strongest can also help the whole team gain the biggest achievements. A good case in point is that the New England Patriots have won most times in the Super Bowl, the final competition of the American football, only because its group members are stronger than any other team’s ones.
On the other hand, however, positive mental attitude can also help individuals achieve the biggest success in some sports. This is because such mental attitude as tenacity can allow the players to persist to the end in the sports which take longer time. For instance, most of the marathon champions are not those who are the strongest but those who can fight to the end. Furthermore, self-confidence can encourage team players to win matches. For instance, the football team of Korea in the 2018 world cup miraculously conquered that of Germany owing to the 100% confidence in themselves rather than stronger physical conditions.
To summarize, there is no doubt that the strongest bodies can help individuals and groups obtain the greatest achievement. At the same, however, confidence and tenacity are also the most important factors to this huge outcome. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that the strongest sportsmen and teams with positive mental attitude can achieve the greatest success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | shell | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-06 | DuongAnh | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
- The civic center will be planned to change There are two maps one is the existing and the other is the plan for new 79
- most countries want to improve their standard of living through economic development, while others think social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical health services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages? 61
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that the strongest sports play...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ronger than any other team's ones. On the other hand, however, positive men...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther than stronger physical conditions. To summarize, there is no doubt that the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11246200608 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6298451289 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522796352584 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2805739736 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273033730878 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090628269732 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787180986778 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167137864139 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386824527175 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.