Sicentific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. Do you agree or dissagree?
Whether the government should take the sole responsibility for scientific research or not has arose a strong controversy among concerning people. While I accept that the state has their own advantages to do research, I disagree that this work should be carried out and controlled only by them.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why the government should do and controll sicientific research. Firstly, this guarantees that the research subjects follow the suitable orientation. Indeed, if the thesis was conduct under controlled of authorities, it is likely in line with government purpose. Nontheless, many companies put the priority on finding out the methodologies or liences to increase their productivities instead of protecting the environment, regardless the government’s policies is to strengthen fresh air or water condition. Secondly, giving the chances to profit-organization to do research may put the quality of work in jeopardy. Facts have shown that, it is the pressure of making higher income that drives reserchers to publich their report without careful checks. For example, Trapha – a reputational pharmaceutical corporation, lauched their vacines without sufficient trial tests, resulting in the dead of more than 100 people.
On the other hand, I believe that allowing companies to carry out siencetific research is beneficial in some ways. Innitially, the government could save a great deal of budget. By sharing this duty to companies, it creates the state easier accesses to allocate budget to other significant sectors such as Economy or Education. Further and even more significantly, private companies could contribute a huge resources of human and technologies to siencetific research. Undeniably, these days, large corporations with numerous of high-skilled and experienced labours as well as advanced machines, are able to give birth of countless inventions. Let’s take Vingroup – a multiple company - as a telling instance, had it not been for their contribution to the peak of spending a considerable part of their earning on siencetific research, the green in-house cultivating vegatable would have never applied in Vietnam.
By the way of conclusion, although the state has their bases to conduct sientific research, it is my perspective that this work should also be shared to private companies
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-16 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
- Some people think that it is more benefit to take part in sports which are played by a team, like football, while other think that taking part in individual sport, like tennis or swimming is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 84
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 78
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 89
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'arisen'.
Suggestion: arisen
...lity for scientific research or not has arose a strong controversy among concerning p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'resource'?
Suggestion: resource
...ivate companies could contribute a huge resources of human and technologies to siencetifi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould also be shared to private companies
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55555555556 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26326371114 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3991090164 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26237238136 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829666580017 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733454785186 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16849552063 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617180716695 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.