Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Recycling is far becoming a serious problem in our modern society nowadays. Some people intend the idea that legislation should be enacted to force citizens to recycle their waste. However, I do believe that it is not the only method to tackle the issue since there are other effective measures that governments should take.
In my opinion, a recycling law is a possible effective solution for the waste problem. Firstly, it reinforces households to separate domestic waste into different bins. Therefore, the further recycling process will be far more effective. Secondly, there should be a punishment for those who do not obey the law. In fact, just a small fine or several weeks serving the community also assists in making people have awareness of their responsibility to recycle their waste. Moreover, prison sentences also act as a deterrent to offenders who frequently break the law. Consequently, the improvement in homeowners’ behaviour could lead to a clean and waste-free environment.
However, there are still several efficient methods which bring great success in the recycling waste process. In terms of education, practical lessons about the environment help greatly in shaping students’ mindset about classifying trash, recycling stuff or even collecting garbage on the street. Moreover, authorities should put more effort into campaigning to educate citizens about 3R, which is reuse, reduce and recycle. From the social perspective, a strict law to reduce unnecessary plastic packages should be put into action. Only by doing so can help reduce the amount of plastic used daily.
From all the above-mentioned, a recycling law is not a primary action to deal with the issue since education and the contribution of the industry is also important. Politicians and activists should join hand to apply the above methods in the recycling progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The plan below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by fore types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007. 67
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reused'.
Suggestion: reused
... to educate citizens about 3R, which is reuse, reduce and recycle. From the social pe...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duce the amount of plastic used daily. From all the above-mentioned, a recyclin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39795918367 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99370937178 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602040816327 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5994634694 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3529411765 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258994763786 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768647742447 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460770848594 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148419092762 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613295204449 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.