The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010.
The line graph illustrates the information about three different capital cities were hosted international conferences over
a period 20 years.
Overall, it is clear that there was so much changes between 3 cities during the time shown. The international conferences organizing in city A and B were constant decline. By contrast, this case in city C quite common, especially at the end of the term.
In 1980, city A and B started with the respective number of international conferences 35 and 30. Over next 10 years, this figure saw a sight drop and continuously decrease into around 25 times in both cities at the end of the time.
In 1980, no international conferences hosting in city C. But there was a significant increase in 1990 with 20 times be hosted. And this number reached a peak of 35 times in 2000. And finally, it went minimal down in 2010 but still higher than in city A and B
- The diagrams show the cross sections of two tunnels one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese island 73
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 56
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children's sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same period. 78
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted Do you agree or disagree 33
- The line graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2000 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re hosted international conferences over a period 20 years. Overall, it is clear...
^^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... Overall, it is clear that there was so much changes between 3 cities during the tim...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66455696203 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90291142276 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7923600978 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.7 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364114437051 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145126154101 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14137681057 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243430698729 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137930023573 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.