Some people want academic subjects such as history and physics to be taught at secondary school. Others want practical skills such as mechanical and gardening to be taught. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There always been a heated debate on choice of subjects that needs to be taught at secondary school level. One group is of the view that history and physics should be compulsory part of curriculum, whereas the other group asserts that mechanical and gardening sort of subjects should be taught. I shall discuss both perspectives in details before reaching a final verdict.
Predominantly, Subjects such as history and physics should be the essential owing to the significance and importance they hold from career building perspectives. By learning these theories, students would be able to choose a right path for themselves. For example by learning physics students can chose to become scientist, Doctors and can do Phd in any field pertaining to physics. Similarly, history learning would provide students the opportunity to become archaeologist.
On the contrary, some people are of the view that subjects such as mechanical and gardening should be taught at early age to in order to start practical life early. Undoubtedly, these learnings will enhance skilled labor expertise in students which will support them to initiate early earning. In this way they can start earning for their families even before finishing their studies. Globally, skilled labor is in demand and many country’s offer permanent residency on the basis of skilled expertise.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, there is no denial that any subject that is taught at secondary level is influential and provides long term benefits. Physics, mathematics or history subjects holds paramount value and at the same time importance of subjects like gardening and mechanical cannot be overlooked. However, in my opinion, subjects like physics of history leads to a successful leading career path, whereas by learning subjects like gardening or mechanical would earn us a blue collar job. Thus physics and history sort of subjects should be given more emphasis.
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these v 67
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development? 78
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party. You are worried that the noise may disturb your neighbour.Write a letter to your neighbour. In your letter•introduce yourself•describe your plans for the party•invite your neighbo 73
- You and your family are living in rented accommodation in an English speaking country. You are not satisfied with the condition of some of the furniture.Write a letter to your landlord. In your letter•introduce yourself•explain what is wrong with the 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'been'.
Suggestion: been always
There always been a heated debate on choice of subjects t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etails before reaching a final verdict. Predominantly, Subjects such as history ...
^^^
Line 4, column 514, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...anical would earn us a blue collar job. Thus physics and history sort of subjects sh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, similarly, so, thus, whereas, for example, sort of, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39016393443 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9053953647 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554098360656 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6191662261 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390828558469 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123567317116 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104609303007 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230890520972 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829593664696 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.