Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give our opinion.
Have you ever wondered our planet is when people have damaged on ecosystem? Many species were extinct to increase individual profits. Some people believe that we do not have enough time to correct our mistakes on environment; however, others think this situation will be improved if we have effective ways. In my opinion, I have the good views in future environment, so we should not give up when we still have opportunities.
It is clear that the consequences which people did on their planet are serious. Some of animals lost their habitat and have an red alarm for extinction. In particularly, the penguin will be died because of ice melting. The forest cover index has reduced day-today due to deforestation. All of them appeared for million years; therefore, our activities are too late to rescue our failures. We cannot rebirth species which are extinct in the past or the forest cannot grown up within several years. Thus, people should accept the real consequences because they cannot do anything to solve this problem.
In contrast, I and other people have a confidence if we have correct assessments and effective solutions, we completely change this context or prevent it increase at least. Indeed, this is not only responsibility of individuals but also all countries around the world. We are finding the best method to speed of pollution. Many projects are made by scientists to protect genie of rare animals or plants to hope rebirth them in the future. In addition, Governments created environment campaign to preserve the animals. Hence, I have the reason to believe on our future life.
In conclusion, the human activities have the negative effects on species is undeniable; but a lot of people on the world are trying to save our biological system. For me, if we do not give up our life, life will not give up us. I predict we will have the appropriate solution for this problem in the next decade.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-09 | oceanyang | 73 | view |
2019-02-15 | quocthinh95 | 61 | view |
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, car and other items. Why is it? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people think that typical teaching of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 Do you agree or disagree 82
- Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give our opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Some of', you should use 'the' ('Some of the animals') or simply say ''Some animals''.
Suggestion: Some of the animals; Some animals
...people did on their planet are serious. Some of animals lost their habitat and have an red alar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... of animals lost their habitat and have an red alarm for extinction. In particular...
^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...deforestation. All of them appeared for million years; therefore, our activities are to...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...etely change this context or prevent it increase at least. Indeed, this is not only resp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on for this problem in the next decade.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, at least, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in particular, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91411042945 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77952028183 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558282208589 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.493972105 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32686557947 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846186414485 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778265641247 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199317495699 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408593292434 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.