TPO41 Independent
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A teacher, regarded as a sacred occupation, is responsible for imparting knowledge and educating people. A proverb widely spread in the folk of China is that a teacher for a day is a father for a lifetime, meaning that we are supposed to treat teachers the same as our father, which really means that teachers ought to be respected. However, from my perspective, due to multiple factors, teachers are less and less valued by the present society, compared to the past centuries.
It is the quality gap between teachers that threaten their own social status. Since people could reach the standards or qualifications of being a teacher easily nowadays, the good and bad are intermingled in the community of teachers. There are countless instances where some so-called teachers, conducting themselves as despicable persons, relentlessly ruin the reputation of the whole group of teachers. social events that the teachers in the kindergarten abused children, that the postgraduates in the university served as free labor for their supervisors, or that some teachers intentionally seized opportunities to sexually assault their students during the courses, pop up every year, which astonishes the society and renders people rethink the divineness of teachers.
The diverse means of learning overshadows the role of teachers in the domain of education. In the past, the scarcity of teaching resources led to teachers-to-students almost the only pattern for the youngsters to acquire knowledge, which contributed to the dignified position of the teachers in that period. Nevertheless, thanks to the inventions and applications of mobile phone, computer, and internet, Massive Open Online courses come into being, and knowledge on these platforms are sufficient for students’ thirst of learning. As a result, teachers are no longer a must for conveying information and knowledge due to those competitive substitutes, thereby degrading the teachers nowadays.
Drawing from the points discussed above, I would like to reinforce my view that the contribution of teachers is being depreciated by today’s society.
- TPO23(integrated) 80
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing TaskImagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wai 78
- tpo40 80
- Tpo41: professor and passage challenge each others on how to rules on coal ash could beneficial 80
- TPO41 IndependentDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Social
...utation of the whole group of teachers. social events that the teachers in the kinderg...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hirst of learning. As a result, teachers are no longer a must for conveying infor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2197261819 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596923076923 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.4258281728 48.9658058833 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5 100.406767564 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101942487828 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402543770081 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235622201471 0.0737576698707 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0593744838915 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223700285689 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 11.7677419355 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.01818996416 133% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.