Some people believe that culture will be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue, but others consider that tourism is the only way of protecting a culture. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
There is a school of thought that tourism is one of the fastest-growing industries throughout the world. Nevertheless, its impact on culture brings much contentious debate. This essay will elaborate on both positive and negative sides of tourism from a cultural perspective.
Providing economic stimulus for cultural preservation is undisputedly one of the main donations of tourism. This is done through attracting tourists, which incentivises governments to invest in and preserve their history and culture. Their mindset has been acknowledged by many tourism sites and money has been subsequently directed toward cultural conservation, including the maintenance of key historical sites.
Moreover, we can see from the New Zealand indigenous culture that it is widely known around the world and tourism plays a large role in promoting this. When a historic site or some sites that shows a country’s cultural heritage is made accessible to the public, vacationers from all over the world will soon flock there. They will share their memory in the local culture with their soul mates and families once they come back home, assisting those sites to gain international fame. Hence, both technical and invested support will flood in protection of cultural and natural supplies.
On the die negative sides, tourism largely revolve around the harm caused to areas and objects, with numerous popular historic sites having been damaged and mistreated by foreign tourists. Traditional foods, drinks, festivals, costumes and other stimulating components of the cultures are highlighted to entertain vacationers, constituting an insult to the locals and leading to damage to the unique nature of a culture. Furthermore, cultural commercialisation has made the sacred ingredient of a cultural routine and visitors are encouraged to attach small importance to a unique tradition, which cannot be found otherwhere.
In a nutshell, there is no doubt that tourism carries on benefits both economically and by providing further reason for cultural preservation. However, the aforementioned drawbacks show that these cultural relics and sites should also be protected from the damage travellers can cause.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-20 | thaohienpt008 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | cactuss5 | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-04 | mridulaielts | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | nguyen thi thu hien | 86 | view |
- Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment. It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Fashion is difficult to follow, and some people argue that we should not follow it. They think that we should dress what we like and feel comfortable. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company. What can companies do to increase staff productivity. 73
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of th 73
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Some people argue that the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62462462462 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09086482028 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615615615616 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5323634399 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.866666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224308158864 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789909544072 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043817390282 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131532297168 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283490864747 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.