With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.
Use of the internet and smartphones has become a global phenomenon and each of us is dependent on these technological marvels in one or the other way. While there is a notion which asserts that widespread use of the internet, online communication and cellular messaging will replace the traditional form of face to face interaction, - I completely disagree with it.
to begin with, the use of the internet and other latest communication technologies drive us to meet new people and contact the dear ones who stay far away. This can especially be true when one gets a chance to express his feelings via a text or phone call. To quote an example, Skype and Facebook have enabled people living in far flung areas to communicate effectively through video chats, thereby enabling us to contact more frequently with people we care about. This has not replaced the way we care and meet others, rather it has made it more convenient and frequent.
While the advancement of technology might scale back in personal contact to some extent for a short term, the web can, in fact, enable the present and future generations to become more polarised towards seeing siblings, parents and mates in the long run. This can be easily visualised by taking into account that if we are to sustain the net as a tool to deliver our emotions and beliefs to the world, we will need to picture proof gatherings, celebrations and events thereby obviating the need for face to face communication. Secondly, it is a well-acknowledged fact that 'the human is a social being' and it is to the credit of this physical presence that we as a species are able to harness long-term relationships, so its value cannot be undermined for times to come. Mere endorsing words of good character by texts cannot inculcate the right kind of virtue, thereby further laying emphasis on human presence for future is required.
To conclude, by seeing both sides of the spectrum, it is clearly evident that the internet and text messaging will not make the face to face communication a footnote of the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | preet kaur | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | Tolik | 95 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-16 | Mohamedyousef777 | 95 | view |
- Some people think that uniform at school is unnecessary and should be banned. 61
- It is important that we maintain and protect the beautiful building of the past, even if it is expensive for countries to do so.Do you agree with this statement? 61
- Science advanced so much that It can now make it possible for people to live 100 years or even 200. some people think it is a good thing, other think that it is a bad thing. discuss both views and give your opinion 11
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. 73
- As the number of private cars has increased, so too has the level of pollution in many cities. What can be done to tackle this increasingly common problem? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...on, - I completely disagree with it. to begin with, the use of the internet and...
^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r our emotions and beliefs to the world, we will need to picture proof gatherings...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, in fact, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83681132827 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579096045198 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7561083803 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.545454545 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1818181818 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270940325649 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09940980879 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107525786772 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198702678697 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109166856955 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.