in some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies.
Nowadays, the issues of the graduated high school students, who delay a year to study in universities for working experience gathering and travel around the world, have sparked off an argument. In my opinion, students should not make such a decision after they finish their high school studies.
There are two main reasons why the requests for gaping a year before they enter universities should not be approved by universities. First, such a decision might distort the student’s study rhythm. Apparently, they have not ever had such a holiday for travel which is longer than a year yet. Thus, they might not become suited to stress and fast rhythm due to study in universities, which lead to the study efficiency and academic performance might drop dramatically in the initial year, in that they need more time to adapt the study in universities.
In addition, compared with practising in a full-time job after obtaining bachelors’ degree, high school students have not acquired sufficient knowledge to be able to get a good practical offer from a good company to acquire working experience. Obviously, such working experience cultivation must be based on professional knowledge. Thus, they might waste a year to acquire a limited amount of industry experience.
In spite of this, the benefit of gap-years is that students indeed have enough time to broaden their horizon through the trip and full-time job. Because they have more opportunities to get in touch with the society earlier. Thus they might plan their studying directions in universities through cultivating more new aspects and perspectives about their further job.
In conclusion, there are a series of further issues caused by gap-year after the high school whatever the purposes planned to finish in a gap year. Because students accumulate limited industry experience, and their study rhythm might be influenced although such gap year is able to provide them with new perspective associated with their jobs and studies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-12 | Narges.s | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Narges.s | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | Widyawatiwatiwid | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | Berliananda Maranditya | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | Ayupsi | 61 | view |
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 61
- The tables below 11
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 78
- Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...zon through the trip and full-time job. Because they have more opportunities to get in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... get in touch with the society earlier. Thus they might plan their studying directio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28840125392 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94350189035 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523510971787 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.0796916606 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.769230769 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187066958623 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753242658738 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663035284066 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124826666152 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850305825438 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.