some people think a sense of competition in children should be encouraged.Others belive that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.
Many people believe that youngsters that have feeling to compare themselves with the others ought to be motivated. However, others claim that toddlers who have conversational skills would become more skilled adult than forementioned child. This essay will take a closer look at the matters, showing my opinion and giving fair reasons to support it.
On the one hand it is true to say that there are factors leading to think that youngsters who have the feeling for comparing would be better adult. Firstly, the feeling to compete will always make the younger ones to be thirsty for improvements, for example: by having this feeling of competition, pupils would learn faster the given material. Secondly, because of it, little ones would be preferred than the others. Thirdly, this feeling will help the infants as a grown adult to be prepared for fighting for their goals and never to surrender.
On the other hand, the forementioned might not be completely true and a child could be better adult by teaching him to co-operate. First, the little one who have been taught to co-operate in th very young age would become more competent mature, for example: a kid with such as communication skills could help him to integrate faster the others. Secondly, to have the ability to co-operate with everyone will help you not only in the school, but in work or everywhere. Third, even as a mature with such skills will help you to correspondent and teach people or your own kids easily and it make you a experience adult. In addition, the forementioned skill will be always and everywhere useful and will make you a better person.
In conclusion , there are evidences providing that claims are true , yet I am inclined to agree with the last one mentioned.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-03-23 | Martin9604 | 67 | view |
- The figure gives information about smoking habits of the UK population by age 61
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists. 56
- Proportion of populatio aged 65 and over. 61
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of kimsville. 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purpse. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...h people or your own kids easily and it make you a experience adult. In addition, th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 598, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...or your own kids easily and it make you a experience adult. In addition, the fore...
^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ke you a better person. In conclusion , there are evidences providing that clai...
^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...evidences providing that claims are true , yet I am inclined to agree with the las...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89932885906 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66850769782 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536912751678 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.423557167 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.307692308 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141771353983 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056578980224 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396283482003 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766094781639 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491484204565 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.