The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided line graph elucidate the information on the population growth in two nations, India and China, since the year 2000 and also forecasted up until 2050.
As can be seen from the graph, it is clear that, India population growth is steadily increased from 2000 and will continue rose until 2050, but China population was higher in 2000 than India, although it will fall down by 2050. There were more population of china were there in 2000 than of India. Around 1,205 billions citizens were there where in India only 1,000 billions people wereas there. By 2020, it has shown that the population of India and China will remain almost same as approximately 1,350 billions. It will remain steady in 2030 for the both nations at round about 1,450 billions humans.
However by 2030, India population will swell and China population will fall. China population will diminish slightly to 1,400 billions by 2050 and India population will probably rise to 1,500 billions.
Overall, India will escalate steadily. On the other hand, China population will remain levelled off till 2030, but then will begin to fall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | ngothithunguyet | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Nehaa Sharma | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | lordwind | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of magazines sold in 5 different countries in 2005 and 2015 A prediction for 2025 is also given 65
- Some people believe that radio is the best way to get news while others think that TV is better for this purpose. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 93
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, then, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02150537634 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32524240149 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.4099196587 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317157167534 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150017784809 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106662715674 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232795627368 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110990242937 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.