Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to use land for human needs than to use land for saving endangered animals.
It is said that the earth is undergoing the 6th mass extinction when people are trying to meet their demands at the expense of many rare animals' life. It is obvious that if this situation is continuing without any constraint, human would be the next victim due to the unlimited exploitation. Hence, I am of the opinion that we must conserve land for endangered species.
First, maintaining the natural diversity of earth is necessary for next generation as people will suffer from the disaster brought by the imbalanced food chain, such as famine. This is especially in the case of significant decreasing of honey bees worldwide recently, which served a pivotal role in helping farmers pollinating crops. As the exploitation of forest done by human due to the need of land for cultivation and living is increasing, on the flip side, this also decreases the living places for honey bees. However, it is an undeniable fact that human could not survive without the existence of honey bees. As a result, we should support endangered species to protect our posterity.
Second, government spends a considerable amount of public money in animal conservation every year; however, if we left enough habitats for animal at first, we could save a large amount of money and use it in other sectors of public service such as education, medication and transportation, which are also in dire need of more funding. Not to mention, natural habitats are far more suitable for wild animals than man-made habitat. Therefore, preserving habitats for animals would be a better choice than using for human needs.
Last, many people think that it would be a waste of resources to let animals use lands instead of developing by human since overpopulation has become a serious issue. However, it would be wise for us to use lands we currently have as opposed to exploit new lands since unlimited exploitations have caused some damages to earth such as global warming. Not to mention, global warming result from wanton destruction of the environment causes a series of changeable consequences that let many people become homeless. Unlike human, animals know how to coexist with the mother planet.
To surmise, in spite of people are currently in need for more land resources, we should not do it at the cost of endangered species’ life. We should change how we deal with the environment so as to protect endangered animals and coexist with them in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-09 | accompnaist00 | 76 | view |
| 2019-04-09 | accompnaist00 | 76 | view |
- Spending money on travelling is better than saving money for the future. 76
- Detailed description of crimes on newspaper and TV can have bad consequences on society so this kind of information should be banned in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 63
- It is more important to keep your old friend than it is to make new friends. 71
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars, some t 3
- TPO52IntegratedTask-Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...eir demands at the expense of many rare animals life. It is obvious that if this situat...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 195, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...change how we deal with the environment so as to protect endangered animals and coexist ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, as to, such as, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98536585366 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79310785989 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521951219512 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2379781296 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.235294118 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298681048452 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951545473265 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082392782937 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15955765843 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344092844069 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.