The best way to educate children is by using the internet in every lesson.' To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children?
It is widely admitted that modern high-tech methods are developed in around every range of subjects, just like internet is proposed to be fruitful approach to educate children. Personally, I do not advocate this statement for several reasons and there are some plausible alternatives to offer lessons more effectively.
Perhaps, one of plausible reasons that there are several negative contents available on the internet, allowing young students to exposure violence on media and to curiously aim for inappropriate websites. Furthermore, i believe that the use of internet affects negatively to children growth owing to that such state-of-the-art technology not only gives an impact on pupils intelectual ability but also may lead to addiction. It seems that, to illustrate this, if children were addicted to surf the browser they would depend on it to accomplish their works in every lesson. This results show that should also consider that the internet access would let children not to be openly critical.
I do appreciate the opposing view, which is that through the internet, children could get low cost information. Nevertheless, on my perspective, young children do not necessarily get the reliable information website or understand when an article contains authorial bias.
Turning to other effective methods in lesson, it would appear to directly undertake field-monitoring study. This approach could develop children's ability and comprehend subjects practically. For instance, to study about ancient artifact, visiting the archeological museum could build up actually visual image relics. In addition, unlike the internet that only shows information visually, green school activity seems to be the suitable alternative for children. Those activities play a beneficial role to support the comprehension of subjects. To demonstrate this, introducing young children to recognize the differences between animals, for example.
To put it in a nutshell, i feel very strongly that the internet contributes negative impacts on children considering their development and negative contents to be the most prominent goals. Indeed, there are several possible alternatives which need to be taken into account, such as field-moniting study and green school activities would bring children to learn every subject more creative and more effective ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-11 | alifdores | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-23 | FAUZIA LIANA UTAMA | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-23 | FAUZIA LIANA UTAMA | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-21 | Muhammad Iswanda | 56 | view |
- Source of complaints and average time from investigation data to final action 94
- Bar chart : amount spent on consumer goods (Belgium, Spain, Austria and Britain) 78
- Academic staff percentages in faculties by gender 2012 72
- The maps show the changes of Springfield primary school in 2005 – 2015. 73
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...or inappropriate websites. Furthermore, i believe that the use of internet affect...
^
Line 8, column 26, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...or example. To put it in a nutshell, i feel very strongly that the internet co...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69318181818 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06821864456 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5433426563 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266164290655 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868652972441 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394510617514 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149603881789 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381219521499 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.