If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?1. Riding bicycle or walking on foot2. Recycling the waste3. Buy local organic food

Essay topics:

If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?
1. Riding bicycle or walking on foot
2. Recycling the waste
3. Buy local organic food

The staggering progress of societies in today’s convoluted world is obvious to everyone, and it is erected upon strong underpinning: individuals’ contribution to society. In this respect, there are miscellaneous proceedings in which people can participate so as to have a positive, moral influence on any given society. Yet to the best of my knowledge, I am of the opinion that riding a bicycle or walking on foot takes precedence over recycling the waste or buying local organic food. Following paragraphs lend credence to this view.
First and foremost, what provokes people to ride a bicycle or walk on foot is that it brings numerous benefits to individuals’ general wellbeing. It is crystal clear that nowadays the considerable numbers of people have been suffering from assorted diseases due to the sedentary activities derived from living in metropolitans. In this regard, mass seductive advertising should be carried out to bring into line those individuals whose activities are less than that required for having mentally and physically salubrious; the absence of which will lead to discomfort and distress, bringing nothing but the sense of disappointment. According to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, those needs for food, shelter, and healthcare are among the basic. Not until the number of healthy and lively people raises can society progress. Riding a bicycle and walking on foot are two critical activities that help people feel assured about their general wellbeing. To make a long story short, accomplished physical activities, people will seize the stupendous achievements in various spectrum of communities such as alleviating concrete relations of people, plummeting juvenile delinquency down, decreasing mental and physical disorders, to name but a few.
What is more, it is worth bearing in mind that walking and riding the bicycle will have an accumulative effect on declining the level of air pollution in every society, which is one of the biggest issues facing sophisticated, large cities. To put in another word, the public transportation and private vehicles are two major contributors to air pollution. Using the bicycle, people are supposed to be the cornerstone of eliminating air pollution emanated from miscellaneous means of transportation, albeit not always explicit. Meanwhile, so beneficial is the role of riding the bicycle and walking on foot that the positive effect of them can be paid off someday in the future like lowering the level of greenhouse gases, which is conducive to protecting the Ozone layer. Having considered these values, many developed, trailblazer countries take various measures toward increasing propagandas to heighten the awareness of people about the merits of walking on foot or using the bicycle and to convince them to think for future, instead of being merely preoccupied with its contemporary effects.
To wrap it up, I have to reiterate that riding the bicycle and walking on foot is one of society’s priorities. That is because it motivates people to lead a healthy lifestyle, and declines the level of air pollution in metropolitans. Should human pay more attention to the significance of these physical activities, they can take advantage of tangible and immediate benefits of this measure either individuals or society as a whole.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-24 niloo.candy 71 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...eedings in which people can participate so as to have a positive, moral influence on any...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, well, while, as to, such as, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2814.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 520.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41153846154 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1660434869 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 900.0 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.087056675 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.105263158 100.406767564 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3684210526 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21052631579 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257474476782 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751608338447 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734499220397 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161263187787 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867679541389 0.0645574589148 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 86.8835125448 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.