In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
A few people obtained extremely high incomes in numerous states. Some individuals consider that it bestows a positive impact for the nation, nevertheless, others believe that authority is supposed to make a rule which concerned of maximum earning wage for every person. In accordance with this statement, this essay will explain both points of view and also put forward my perspective in the following paragraphs.
In regard to the issue, I do appreciate to the opinion which thought that if a number of masses acquire an enormous wages it will render a positive influence to the states. Nonetheless, I do believe that this attempt is not an excellent thing to do since there are still numerous societies who lived in economically deprived circumstances. Therefore, I would rather support another views because it is able to create an equality incomes for all citizens.
In accordance with the argument above, there are several efforts that the bureaucrat is able to do in order to create a better impact for all communities. The government, first and foremost, has to make a minimum and maximum salaries for every worker, according to this, the wage range between the people who is obtained a minimum salary and maximum wage should not be too far in order to create less social inequality. Second but not less crucial, the authority, furthermore, has to make an obligation for all people to report all their incomes in order to control and maintain the people who derive a tremendous wage.
By way of conclusion, it seems to me that monitoring all people incomes are necessary to be done. Thus, in order to create a better equality among all individuals, we, as a part of the citizen, have to observe the regulation which the bureaucrat has already made.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | marin123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Shweta sahu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | kaushii | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Dolang | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
- Line graph : wheat exports 1985 – 1990. (Canada, Australia, European community) 100
- MIX : The Pie chart and bar chart shows some data which concerned on arrest number 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefi 78
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'wage'?
Suggestion: wage
... a number of masses acquire an enormous wages it will render a positive influence to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96283783784 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82676208967 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537162162162 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2881400202 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.545454545 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172437962273 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665724451807 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435373331727 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102966523669 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659734359516 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.