The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The charts depict a range of after-class activities in which the U.K bachelors and postgraduates participated in 2008.
Overall, most of students in U.K with no full-time work were more likely to opt for further study after school rather than voluntary jobs. Furthermore, it is evident that higher-learners shared the same pattern whereas being a part-timer proved to be a rational alternative for extra learning.
In comparison with the number of graduates undertaking further study, which was 29665, there were only 3500 volunteers who are willing to enroll for voluntary chores. Besides, 17735 bachelors had part-time work while 16235 others were unemployed, which was ten-fold higher than that of postgraduate students.
Regarding postgraduates, further study was still the most favorable option with 2725 students, followed by part-time work with 2535. In contrast, being a volunteer got little to none attention with only 345 proponents. Unemployment among postgraduates made up for nearly haft of those doing further study, which was 1625.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pateldhruv1708 | 91 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Noah1997 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | trunghn1 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 78 | view |
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels such as gas and oil To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The qualities that help people reach success in modern life cannot be learned in university or other academic institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 72
- Many countries have compulsory military service for men after they leave school It would be a good idea to adopt this system for men and possibly women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...f after-class activities in which the U.K bachelors and postgraduates participate...
^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
...uates participated in 2008. Overall, most of students in U.K with no full-time work were more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...2008. Overall, most of students in U.K with no full-time work were more likely...
^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...l alternative for extra learning. In comparison with the number of graduates undertakin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, regarding, so, still, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02272641832 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6875 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0299820216 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13400531422 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614455336596 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526910731314 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934169249334 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372566697372 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.