The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe over the 3 years 2005, 2009, 2015, compared with the European average. Summaries the given information and show comparison which relative
The bar chart given illustrates the car ownership in five unspecified countries in Europe and the average European statistics over the course of 10 years starting from 2005.
An initial impression from the chart is that the number of car owned in all five nations was somewhat erratic. And owning a car was the most popular in Country 5.
In 2005, there were roughly 300 cars per one thousand people in Country 1. This figure witnessed a marginal increase of 100 cars four years later, before dropping back to 2005’s level in 2015. The same pattern was shown in the statistics for Country 2, which were around 500 cars per 1000 citizens. Meanwhile, there was a gradual decrease in the number of cars from 650 in 2005 to 550 in 2015 in Country 3. The figure for Country 4 remained stable during the time given, at 700 cars.
Country 5 started at a relatively high position of over 90%, which was followed by a slight slump of 200 cars, before reaching a peak of nearly 1000 cars in 2015. A similar picture was evident in the average-of-5-countries data, beginning at 700 cars and finishing at 790 cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | Thu Mo | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | Diem Hang 1612 | 78 | view |
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial. Is globalization positive or negative? 84
- Foreign tourist abroad should be charged more than local people when visiting the local historical and cultural tourist attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The figure below is a town planning map Showing the likely position of new shopping centers as well as the various different zones and major transportation route of the town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 80
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 11
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.Do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64467005076 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70468361518 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598984771574 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7720561332 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309802570707 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130706281917 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643193319415 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191075128225 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713291773155 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.