Do you agree or disagree? If people have the opportunity get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a satisfying job.
With the staggering progress of societies, in today’s convoluted world, finding a decent job is more sought after in comparison that it used to be. In this regard, some people believe that people should delay their work until finding a satisfying job. However, some others stand at the other extreme, holding the view that individuals should take a job as soon as possible, even if it is not the desired job. Yet to the best of my knowledge, I side with those people believing the latter idea. In the following paragraphs, I elaborate on my standpoint.
First and foremost, what provokes people to take any job they find is that it brings them immediate income. It is crystal clear that individuals, at schools, are taught to be responsible, and they are interested in getting independent of their families, standing on their own feet. In this regard, carrying out any job providing a sufficient amount of money rather than waiting for a satisfying career, individuals can earn a living, thereby maintaining and improving their standards of living. It has been acknowledged that undue delay of accomplishing an occupation is a culprit of high expectation toward a job. It stands to the reason that some people wait to find a decent, desired job after graduation, hindering them from earning regular income through working.
What is more, by taking a job instantaneously, albeit not always desirable, people can broaden their horizon and get redeeming experiences, in detriment of not having a fascinating job. To shed more light on this issue, miscellaneous jobs open opportunity for people to be versatile, paving the way toward finding satisfactory occupation in the near future. Moreover, executing any job take precedence over squandering times, cultivating a sense of dissatisfaction with the passing of time. In addition, stupendous experiences, attained from doing various, in access job, help people to search for their satisfying job obsessed with before. An example can drive this nothing home. I am reminded of the days after graduation that I was looking for my rewarding career, being a strategic manager. I spent a considerable amount of time, effort, and energy to find a satisfactory job. Neither did I find any desirable job related to my major, nor I made any money to live by, only did I waste my time. After two years searching for management occupations, I found a job not related to my major, but I could get different, invaluable experience through doing some voluntarily strategic works which broadened my perspective that how to find my decent job in the future.
In the final analysis, I have to reiterate my viewpoints that people should take a job right away instead of waiting for a satisfying job. This is because they are provided a chance of earning instant, regular money, along with they can gain many precious experiences during working which help them broaden their horizon to find their desired job.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-08 | niloo.candy | 80 | view |
- TPO44 73
- Do you agree or disagree? If people have the opportunity get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a satisfying job. 80
- The most important problem affecting the society can be solved during my lifetime 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "A person should never make an important decision alone." 88
- Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book. Which one do you prefer? 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, in addition, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05544147844 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95357875391 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521560574949 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3236049713 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.238095238 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1904761905 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37173542962 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117558954354 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100358858648 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252595883306 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455617101616 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.