-The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions.
It is known that technology have been improving fastly throughout human existence. This evolving caused big social changes and people try to kept together with technological life. However, have all people around the world been keeping up with technological life ? It is right that technology bring warfare, easy life and money to human life but it is considered that if the range of technology decrease, difference in between poor and rich people rise.
To start with, technology which released to large part of society gives many change to people for improving their life and making money. And also, this have been becoming easy with in time. People, who are lucky benefit opportunities of technology easily. For example, person who was born in rich family can reach technology easily and he/she can find many possibilities and facilities for improving technology according other people. Thus, it is supposed that there is social inequality between part of society which can reach and improve technology and can not benefit technology.
On the other hand, actually, brought warfare with technology, which release to big part of society can develop the society easily. In this case, people who can not reach technological advantages become to find new opportunities with cheap technology because as technology improve and release, technology get cheap and become be reached easily. Thus, people have almost same opportunities and everybody can have life whatever they want.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that, thanks to technology, people can find more equal right and they can obtain same social condition and life instead of that different life and unfair competition appear among people because of rich and poor people life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | fhu | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Harpreet Singh Kooner | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | smiles | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | Muhammed_10 | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-26 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
- -It is said that "Not everything that is learned is contained in books". 61
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. 67
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Each year, the crime rate increases.What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity? 56
- -Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used constuctive purposes ? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun change seems to be countable; consider using: 'many changes'.
Suggestion: many changes
...released to large part of society gives many change to people for improving their life and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30141843972 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66251075642 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517730496454 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0983667184 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17739379705 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722427597477 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489375301839 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121560000806 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285931478556 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.