Honest is the important quality in choosing a leader
From the general assembly of the united nations to customers and retailers, honesty is what people all revere in the society. As a very crucial part for students in universities or high schools to take a glimpse at how the society works, it is very natural for people to believe that leaders of student organizations shall have such quality. From my perspective, the argument is valid as honesty can justify the power they have and help them work smoothly.
One major reason is that honesty serves as the very foundation of why leaders should acquire their power, a right to do good for their believers. Most of the leaders for a student organization are elected by students through democratic procedures. During that process, they tend to make guarantees over the way they will exercise their power to change the campus into a better place, just like politicians. The voters, without a doubt, support a certain person not because the person he or she is, but the promises rendered with good faith. Dishonest leaders betray such bond between people, which means they certainly will not realize or even put effort into the marvelous prospect they once alleged. Therefore, the student's mutual benefits would sure be impaired afterwards.
Another major reason for people to back honest leaders is that they tend to have great performance in terms of their job. Take the student union as an example, the union sometimes asks companies to be sponsors of events in the campus, because the financial supports they offer are essential to hold events in the campus. The contracts signed or drafted by the parties involved needs supervision. An honest and prudent leader will certainly supervise himself, preventing himself from misconduct like misappropriation of the union's fund. Yet, a malicious leader may damage both parties benefit for his own merit. Thus, upcoming events will not be able to carry on and there will be few future partners willing to cooperate with the union. In the long-term, certain functions or goals of an organization cannot be achieved and may take years to recover.
Admittedly, some people would argue that abilities to connect with others or firm support from teachers is the important feature when it comes to selecting a leader for a student organization. The argument does have a point since leaders must extend their social network or have teachers to endorse them to make certain things happen. However, it does not mean any good to the voters if the leader is not honest, which means honesty is still what voters shall consider first.
In conclusion, leaders have a burden to have a great variety of qualities to attract his or her voters. Compared with other qualities, however, honesty is the first priority for students to decide whom to vote for as it can be of their gain later.
- Celebrities should have privacy like everyone else 78
- Public speaking course should be mandatory in college 90
- Education is more difficult than it used to be 73
- the significance of art education 73
- For the successful development of a country, the government should focus its budget on young children's education rather than on universities. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they have and help them work smoothly. One major reason is that honesty serves ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its would sure be impaired afterwards. Another major reason for people to back ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chieved and may take years to recover. Admittedly, some people would argue that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...till what voters shall consider first. In conclusion, leaders have a burden to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97674418605 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58766875227 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53911205074 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5282810969 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.095238095 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5238095238 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38095238095 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154909090531 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454279578841 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501967384227 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873253611281 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044473925126 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.