Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to
reducing traffic accidents. Others, however,believe that other measures would be
more effective in improving road safety.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While a majority of people suppose that relentless penalties for the careless driver are good ways to decrease road accidents, others think that some different solutions could carry out to support traffic safety. In my view, I totally agree with the second statements.
On the one hand, we can not refuse the benefits of strict fines for driving habits. Without these laws, a number of careless drivers will disregard human life and the consequences tend to more serious. For example, in 2005, because of government do not enact the hard punishments for these drivers, more than 4000 cases of car accidents happened in just the first 5 months. Besides, if offensive drivers did not go to jail because of their careless that lead to death for others, more and more innocent people would be suffered by them.
On the other hand, some measures can be implemented to improve road safety. Firstly, if authorities can construct more pavement for pedestrians, they tend to walk on their ways instead of the roads for cars. For instance, in Hanoi, road accidents reduced dramatically because of the building of the priority pavements. Secondly, police officers should increase their appearance in the intersection of the streets to balance the traffic flows. Because people usually do not know how to escape when traffic congestion happens in the rush hours, and the officers will guide and instruct them to deal with these situations.
In conclusion, although hard punishments can improve road safety, I believe that some other ways also will decrease traffic accidents.
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 67
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 61
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year. 84
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024. 67
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uct them to deal with these situations. In conclusion, although hard punishments...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14453125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63877234843 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.807264111 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277792684912 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992321916903 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735535658288 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182969222491 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045002367316 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.