TPO-25
In the set of materials the reading passage argue about one discovery of set of clay jars that contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. that archeologist proposed that vessels were ancient electric batteries. However, that don’t fine evidence that prove the vessels were electronic batteries. In the other hand, the listening passage adding the extra evidence that show the vessels can be electronic batteries.
The reading passage talk about some theories that show this vessels cant were batteries because first, there aren’t any metal wires near the vessel because the vessels always have been attached to some electricity conductors such metal. Second, the cylinders that discovered near jar anciently were used for holding scrolls of sacred text not for generation electricity and finally, they think vessels would have been quit useless to them.
The listening passage completely rejected their readings theories that belief the vessel that discovered by local people and maybe they don’t take attention the metals and think it’s very ordinary metal. And they thing the cylinder is similar to that we use to generation electric. finally, they thing the batteries maybe peoples used batteries to show they have super power or something like that.
To sum it all up by talking all the details into consideration the reading passage talk about some reasons that show the jar that discovered can’t be a battery vessels and the listening passage adding some extra reason to prove that can be battery.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 40 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | mahan vahab kashi | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | SeehtEntity | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | negar.sh | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | nahid77777777 | 78 | view |
- TPO 38 3
- Tpo22Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 60
- TPO39 3
- TPO 45- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 68
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...opper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. that archeologist proposed that vessels were...
^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ut some theories that show this vessels cant were batteries because first, there are...
^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
...res near the vessel because the vessels always have been attached to some electricity conductors...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: YOU_THING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'think' or 'thinks'?
Suggestion: think; thinks
...it's very ordinary metal. And they thing the cylinder is similar to that we use ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
... to that we use to generation electric. finally, they thing the batteries maybe peoples...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: YOU_THING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'think' or 'thinks'?
Suggestion: think; thinks
...e to generation electric. finally, they thing the batteries maybe peoples used batter...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37037037037 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55391490247 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530864197531 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5792650157 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47262178162 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206561445924 0.0996497079465 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120044096077 0.0662205650399 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285008068826 0.162205337803 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145890715801 0.0443174109184 329% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.