Traveling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies?
Recently, the phenomenon of traveling to study is over-rated and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individual. I am inclined to believe that studying locally can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the role of travelling for tertiary studies can provide the society with some noticeable effect which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. according to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a pubic arena, the advantages of travelling to study over rated might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling argument on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the having brilliant studied locally far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | ghazal123 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | bradkina | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | bradkina | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | mndpsngh21 | 77 | view |
- people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are over crowding the city. do you agree or disagree? 88
- climate change 11
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life andwork? 88
- Business and financial organizations need to hard work to environmental challenges 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...g impacts have sparked a heated debate. although contested by many that the matter of co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...y can be seen. Within the realm of a pubic arena, the advantages of travelling to ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: OVER_RATED[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overrated'?
Suggestion: overrated
..., the advantages of travelling to study over rated might increase the consequences of crit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...foundly believe that the benefits of the having brilliant studied locally far out...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.688 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21844683038 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4816498313 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.272727273 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223438604778 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785610785912 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093468330148 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127222807296 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326572620272 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.3 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.