Many people today prefer socializing online to that in the local community, do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In contemporary time, there is a proliferation of consensus that the Internet has a great contribution to the development of cutting-edge life's pace. Notwithstanding, some people fear that face-to-face communication in the scope of the local neighborhood has been fleeing by social networking while others argue that online chats have tremendously merits to enlarge the circle of friends. I am biased towards the former opinion and the following essay will be analyzed in both views in depth.
Initially, it is essential to recognize that online social networking plays a significant role when breaking through the barrier of language, culture and geographical distance via international relation all around the world. To be more specific, the geographical barrier took its toll on the number and scope of friends individual can make, which means that the international relation was made only in the proximity in which we live and work. Therefore, the diversity of the relationship was restricted in the forefather. By way of illustration, based on the wide range of social networking such as Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram that people are able to build business connections like shopping online or interact with idols via live stream.
On the flip side, it is equally pivotal to acknowledge that the shortcoming of online socialization can also not be underestimated and the potential risk of being a victim of cybercrime obviously stand out. This means the personal information will be assembled and attended to blackmail aim by the hackers. Moreover, in daily communicate that people tend to aesthetic and the smartphone will become an integral part of their life, especially teenager generation. Fortunately, this hazard is able to easily avoided if users fine-tune rational.
Beyond any doubt, it is obvious that online social networking as a positive contributor to the interpersonal relationship. Besides, I hope that users should carefully check the information prior to the update and will have deliberation about the time-consuming for Facebook in the long run.
- In many countries people like to eat a wide variety of food that are grown in other areas As a result they eat more food produced in other regions than local food Do you think the advantages of this development outweighs the disadvantages 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries people like to eat a wide variety of food that are grown in other areas As a result they eat more food produced in other regions than local food Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history in their country Why is this What can be done to increase young people s interest in famous people in the history of their country 89
- Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41049382716 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24285498347 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614197530864 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2431323881 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.846153846 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113480788992 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03453122654 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041422005098 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649331031303 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130656205859 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.