The government's investment in arts, music, and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Arts, which include, theatres, music, visual arts, all hold immense importance to the heritage of a country. While many people agree that the government should invest money on more prominent concerns of the country than arts, I strongly disagree with such peeps.
It is obvious that people will prefer financing more on public services. They are right to contend that art is a waste of money with no outcome but for mere lavishness. Many people, particularly in Pakistan, believe that arts ruin the future of youth as they tend to select their career in it than opting for reputable fields such as medicine or engineering.
Nevertheless, the arts hold a valuable place in a country. Firstly, they are a source of entertainment for ones interested in creativity, music, films, exhibitions, etc. Most Individuals find music as a source of mood lifter and consider it as a cure to stress. Apart from entertainment, films or dramas can be used as a platform to spread awareness. For example, a movie based in Pakistan by the name of “Malik” depicted the corrupted politicians that prevail in the country and that is surely an eye-opener for people, who were unaware of such dark side of Pakistan.
Secondly, art is a source of money for people, who are eager to pursue a career in it. On the other hand, exhibitions or museums can attract many foreigners to appreciate the country’s history and culture. Thus, the government can use funding from tourism for the country’s overall development.
After weighing the pros and cons, while it seems vital to spend money into public facilities, a small proportion of finance invested on arts would not cause any loss but can rather benefit the economy and development of a country.
- The government's investment in arts, music, and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 78
- The only way to solve the increasing crime rate of young offenders is to teach parents better parenting skills. To what extent do you agree? 84
- The only way to solve the increasing crime rate of young offenders is to teach parents better parenting skills. To what extent do you agree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, while, apart from, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00343642612 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9443414479 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591065292096 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4809235492 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154886762653 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512645938899 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647594827573 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927334830389 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765712246745 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.