study or work
Although topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on young people have to focus on study can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My view is irrespective of the numerous arguments that exit on either sides, the adolescents' concentration in their studies have various positive aspects as per the below illustration.
There are numerous reasons in favor of my stance. To commence with, the young generations can enhance their knowledge and sharp their minds from study. It is crucial to note that when the youngsters study their lessons, they may share more effectively in their nation's economic advancement. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that the governments should launch awareness campaigns to shed more light on the above privileges which the youngsters could get from the above concept.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument that young people can be updated by the technological breakthrough advancement, also knowledge. As soon as they study their material and notes, they could be updated by the tech-savvy science. It is exemplifies that the educationalists should conduct extra-curricular activities to draw people's attention of the above advantages to achieve the nations' prosperity.
In conclusion, there is equally potential evidence to support my notion, and hence my opinion is that the study is more beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-08 | Behnaz fallah | 80 | view |
| 2020-10-02 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2020-08-10 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | Gohar Khan | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-01 | xiaojia | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adolescents'' or 'adolescent's'?
Suggestion: adolescents'; adolescent's
...rguments that exit on either sides, the adolescents concentration in their studies have var...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... of the above advantages to achieve the nations prosperity. In conclusion, there is ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 212.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64150943396 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29220953851 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6255532179 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127992034584 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502164427411 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504501020679 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854932830126 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331971911223 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.