Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change.
Technology has always changed the way we communicate with each other. Back in the 50’s era, landline phones brought a revolution in the field of communication. Since then there was a drastic change in our primary communication method. The introduction of smartphones has made its user’s life much more comfortable but this change is not entirely a good thing. There are both pros and cons of this change. I will elaborate my views further in this article.
Earlier we need to visit someone’s home to convey a message, and now it is just a matter of click, and the message is delivered to the person sitting in any corner of the world. The Smartphones have not only changed the way we connect with other people but now we can’t imagine life without these devices. For example, Personal safety apps use GPS tracking system which helps us to get home safely even at midnight. Some people can’t spend a single day without their smartphones.
From shutting down the alarm clock in our smartphone early morning till checking emails before sleeping, in all smartphone is in our all activities. And as a result, it has made us anti-social. In the effort to connect with other people who are far away from us, we are ignoring those who are sitting right beside us. To avoid getting ignored they too get themselves busy in the smartphone. For example: If you are in a room with your near and dear ones, there are more chances that everyone is working with his/her smartphone rather than conversing with each other.
A study suggests that the use of smartphones have negatively affected conversations held between good friends. Though in the past ten years our communication level has increased but just hitting the ‘send’ button does not mean a productive conversation. As technology is advancing, we are getting more introvert.
Taking cues from my personal experience, I can say that smartphones are more of a distraction. The face-to-face conversation will always remain the most effective method of communication, and it’s better to turn off the smartphones or at least resist the temptation to reach for it immediately when talking to a friend or someone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | gurwinder singh sandhu | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | gurwinder singh sandhu | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-10 | arami | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
- Problems are benefits for high school study plays and works of theatricality centuries ago. 72
- Use of credit card. Advantages and Disadvantages. 55
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change. 84
- Do you think that consumers should avoid over packed product or it is the responsibility of the producers? 55
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries. According to you what solution can be proposed by government and individuals? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...volution in the field of communication. Since then there was a drastic change in our ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, at least, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 20.9802955665 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 31.9359605911 163% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1207.87684729 152% => OK
No of words: 365.0 242.827586207 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04109589041 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 3.92707691288 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98166788962 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 139.433497537 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594520547945 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 379.143842365 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6551724138 158% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0835345292 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.65 7.25397266985 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0807899283001 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0309324147167 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455683480084 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504332009266 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070373045206 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.