Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
When one thinks of technology, one tends to think about the difficulties it can create when it isn'Overall technology does make our lives simpler, even if it appears to be complicated for the person using the technology.
When one says that technology makes our lives complicated, it evokes images of people sitting at a computer trying to print a document, or connect to a web page, and that person seeing on their screen that the computer cannot connect to the printer or the dreaded 404 error message on the internet browser. While this may seem to make a person's life more complicated because they need to fix the issue, it is only a symptom of how humans' lives have been made simpler. It is now much simpler and less complex to recreate a document. Instead of scribes working diligently by candlelight to painstaking copy one character after another, or using a printing press, itself a new technology when it was invented, and carefully arranging the charcters to recreate a work; we can now simply press Ctl + P on a document and it will automatically print a hardcopy for us, or we can connect to the internet and share it as a document for people to open from their own computers. This makes our lives simpler and less complex, because it vastly assists with completing different tasks. This is not to say that computer issues cannot complicate our lives, because when we do run into an issue it feels like we spend far longer fixing the issue and it produces feelings of anger and annoyance until IT can come resolve the issue. However, the simplifiction of sharing information is enormous compared to the level of complexity it introduces when it does not work as we would always desire.
Another way in which technology has simplified our lives is through how we travel and move products. The method of travel was originally using one's feet, and placing one foot in front of another. If one wanted to bring goods to trade then they would either need to carry it themselves, or use a domesticated animal. While this may be a simple method of travel, it is inefficent and would require a complex amount of planning of how far one could go in a day, and where they would stop before reaching their destination. All of this would need to be done without the use of the internet, thus increasing the complexity of planning a trip, because the information was not just a google search away. Nowadays we have mass transit hubs such as ports, train stations, air ports, and highways. These all make travel and moving products simpler, because there are designated areas for travel, meaning that everyone is aware of where they need to go in order to travel to a different area. Moving goods is also simpler, because of the ability to transport massive quantities of goods from one side of the world to another. All of the trinkets and gadgets that are stamped "Made in China" is possible because of the ability to move products around the globe with cargo ships. While the systems that are put in place to manage this type of travel may appear complex and different to understand, without them our lives would be much more complex, because we would need to find the information and figure out how to travel without the ease of knowing where the mass transit areas are located, and where we could find a product to buy that is unique to a country thousands of miles away.
Overall, while technology may itself be complex and sometimes difficult to use, its effects on our lives are to greatly simplify them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Siddiqur Rahman | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Evil-wasp | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | xipaheje | 16 | view |
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 66
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'message' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'messages'.
Suggestion: messages
...to the printer or the dreaded 404 error message on the internet browser. While this may...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... browser. While this may seem to make a persons life more complicated because they need...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e method of travel was originally using ones feet, and placing one foot in front of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1116, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
... from one side of the world to another. All of the trinkets and gadgets that are stamped &...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1661, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thousand'?
Suggestion: thousand
...duct to buy that is unique to a country thousands of miles away. Overall, while techno...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, thus, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2909.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 619.0 442.535393258 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69951534733 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98795655647 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5779880474 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473344103393 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 924.3 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 14.0 3.10617977528 451% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.6250310635 60.3974514979 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.105263158 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5789473684 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188387772582 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620645708877 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072754168424 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146098819989 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420849531487 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.