The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The two maps illustrate the layout of the island, before and after construction. Overall, it is clear that from the comparison of the two maps, many entertaining facilities will be built in the future.
Starting with the first map, the island is about 250 meters long and in the middle of it is an extremely large empty area, with two groups of trees in the east and west. On the west of the island is a beach.
Turning now to the future development of the island, the most significant change is that a group of accommodations will be built in the middle of the island, forming a circle and connected by a footpath. Another group of accommodations will be constructed around the trees in the west and will be also linked by a footpath, by which tourists can easily reach the beach where they can go swimming. Between the two housing areas will be a reception surrounded by a vehicle track. Through the track, travelers can go to a restaurant in the north and arrive at a pier where they can go sailing.
- In many countries, the elderly proportion of the population is increasing steadily. Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society? 56
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 73
- Some people believe that home study is better than schooling. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Schooling is no longer necessary since more and more information is accessible on the Internet and students can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 51
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50273224044 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7055747947 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530054644809 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3295524562 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194557908667 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996370870885 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101465412994 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151034194612 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624915355868 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.