life was better when technology was simpler. Do
you agree or disagree?
There is a conflicting argument regarding that if people lived with a simpler tenology enviroment could lead to a better life. In my opinio, more advance tenologies would benefit a better life.
Admittedly, suffering less pressure was the significant benefit to live in the lower-tech society due to less intensive contact. In the past, sending the letter is the most common way to communicate with others. The letter delivery was always taken weeks or months depands on the diferent distance. It might help to lower the tense and pressure after long waiting in both sides. Moreover, people could have more opportunities to chat face-to-face, which can relax their minds. By contrast, the technology only be helpful due to the emergency situation. For instance, people would use telegram to send the important message within a few words in the past.
Nevertheless, the above argument in one-sided, it fails to consider the long-term damage that would entail. For one, less sopiciticated technology could not creat an efficient human society. The unefficient enviroment can not provide a dynamic and passionate creativities which can be productive to human’s life. For example, without the self-drive sysytem by Tesla, people could not free hands to drive with a peaceful mindset, and the pedestrians could not be protected effectively by the auto-brake function. Indeed, Tesla has contributed to lower the accdident rate on the roads.
For another, to expect the unpexpected is relying on the technology development. The simpler technology could not be lead a globolization trend to the world. For example, without the traffic tech innovation, people could not travel for a longer distance to discover all kinds of possibilities.
To sum up, simpler tech could keep people in a certain life style which might make them happy. But the new technology is the only key to keep promoting human’s life bettter and better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-06 | S.Ranaut | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | syed fasi uddin | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed | 86 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed | 67 | view |
- Some people think to lower the maximum speed on all roads can make road saver ,some think there are another way, discuss in both view and give your opinion. 56
- Some people think to lower the maximum speed on all roads can make road saver ,some think there are another way. Discuss in both views and give your opinion. 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- Someone think the best way to keep the road safety is lower the maximum speed on all the roads, someone think there are another better way. Dicuss in both views and give your opinion 56
- Someone think the best way to keep the road safety is lower the maximum speed on all the roads, someone think there are another better way. Dicuss in both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...message within a few words in the past. Nevertheless, the above argument in one-...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2987012987 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9510183028 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574675324675 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.760985471 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8947368421 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2105263158 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16505391866 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512426831742 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516149215076 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101039388188 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049459378292 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.