The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
The given pie charts compares the annual spending of a school in London on different running cost in three separate year; 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Over this span of 20 years, Teacher’s salaries holds the highest expenditure among the all mention categories whereas insurance shows the progressive annual expense over the period.
As a matter of fact, Teacher’s salaries showed an upward trend; starting form 40% annual expenditure in 1981 and reached up to a 45% at the end of the period, despite there was a slight increased on these annual expenses in 1991. Similarly, annual expense of Other worker’s salary start from 28% in its initial period and there was a gradual decline on these trend and stabilized at 15% at the end of the period. Moreover, Resources (e.g; books) showed and overall fluctuation regarding annual spending, rising from 15% of average annual spending in 1981, this trend of annual spending rose gradually at 20% by 1991 and after having a dramatic fall it was then stabilized at 9% in 2001 whilst annual spending on Furniture and equipment showed and increasing pattern; with 15% of annual expenditure in 1981 and reached up to 23% of average expenditure in 2001, though there was a sudden fall was noticed in 1991 in the question.
Lastly, insurance was the most progressive expense in London, starting from 2% of its initial expense there was a gradual increase on these trend and reached up to 8% at the end of the period in question.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-12 | Miss Zune | 78 | view |
2019-08-29 | Jonkun | 67 | view |
2019-06-24 | dilipkarki | 67 | view |
2019-01-12 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
2018-06-28 | Manpreetgill | 73 | view |
- Tarnagul is a small town near Melbourne The maps show the town s development over a period of time 64
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in future, such as science and technology. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your 73
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, then, whereas, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.916 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72149664707 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.841926429 43.030603864 285% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 204.833333333 112.824112599 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.6666666667 22.9334400587 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6666666667 5.23603664747 261% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258294941013 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150165781216 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147134125604 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172784403623 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161522383263 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 13.2329268293 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.