CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union and the percentage of funds being spent on different form of transport
The bar chart gives information about CO2 emissions for different forms of six transports in the European Union. The pie chart also provides the comparison of European Union expenditure being spent on eight different types of transportation. Overall, as can be seen that the highest amount of CO2 emissions happened to be in air transportation whilst the biggest funds spent in road expense clearly and measured in percentage.
Looking at the first chart initially, the most positive movement CO2 discharges had to be in air transport which reached up to 327 grammes per passenger-km approximately. Then, the passenger cars was the next highest CO2 emissions which marked around 125 grammes per passenger-km. Contrastingly, the remaining transport which those were buses, maritime, rail, and coaches trends happened to be around 45 until 60 grammes per passenger-km, thoroughly the coaches seem as the lowest trend.
Regarding to the second chart, the largest transport expense had to be invested in roads which counted at 52% exactly. The second largest percentage obviously plotted in railways sector which stood at 31% respectively. Then, it was followed by public transport expenditure spent at 10%. Reversely, there were minor expenses remained specifically ports, intermodal, inland waterway, airports, and unknown which percentage happened to be 1-2% approximately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-25 | ribimultisona | 89 | view |
- Preferred leisure activities of Australian children 67
- UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
- Rail transport in four countries in 2007 67
- CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union and the percentage of funds being spent on different form of transport 89
- changes in annual spending by a particular UK in 1981, 1991, and 2001 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, regarding, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62679425837 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10694729509 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617224880383 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4812005612 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.6 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368156194626 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147398662917 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132056933356 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254960582542 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194757428497 0.0819641961636 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.