Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the
protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human
population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people believe that spending large resources to conserve wildlife creators is less important than invest in human communities. In my viewpoint, I disagree with the opinion given and I think that we should allocate our time and money to preserve the ecosystem to make our lives healthier.
The protection of wild animals is a priority. On the one hand, the wildlife extinction results in ecological crisis which affects the biodiversity of nature. For example, the illegal poaching of elephant ivory and rhino horns will decrease the number of creatures soon. On the other hand, protecting wild animals mean that preserving their habitat such as rain forests and wetlands which are not only crucial accommodation for animals but also affect climate change. If human's urbanization destroys these factors, it will insult food production and changes the atmosphere of the environment which impacts directly to global's healthy.
Therefore, human communities are also benefited by conservation wildlife. Firstly, it will promote tourism from all over the world to these areas. For instance, Tram Chim National Park, in Dong Thap province, always attracts not only lots of tourists in Vietnam but also the number of foreigners to experience the glamorous local nature. Secondly, tourism will grow dramatically and creates more jobs for the natives. Therefore, the quality of life of local people will increase rapidly when they have new jobs and the opportunities to make friends with tourists.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the view expressed in the statement and I believe that our resources and budgets should spend on wildlife creatures to protect biodiversity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Vijitha00 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | taho.ielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | taho.ielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | myra124 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | Tri H. Ho | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993and 2012. 67
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 61
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology ofdeveloping countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to2010. 61
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on theprotection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the humanpopulation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the biodiversity of nature. For example, the illegal poaching of elephant ivory a...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... impacts directly to globals healthy. Therefore, human communities are also be...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unities to make friends with tourists. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4030418251 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81252159557 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631178707224 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9845882556 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.307692308 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0785030377522 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025608964091 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419254822741 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542437486204 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472277598115 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.