Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples.
It has argued by a significant number of individuals that state and bigger organizations must plan collectively for improvement in the environmental conditions instead of pushing these problems on people. In my opinion, I completely agree because such projects required a large amount of money and higher authorities are more responsible for those conditions of the ecosystem.
Firstly, repair of the environment on a broader scale requires a huge amount of money and manpower, thus the involvement of higher authorities is essential to provide funds and labour for those big tasks. For instance, the Ganga River cleaning project in India is the plan of 4 years with total costing of 200 billion dollars, in which 100 teams of 4 organizations are involved to make the river water potable.
Secondly, modernization by the government and private sectors has made various changes in the society and it has reflected adversely on the atmosphere, therefore governments or companies should solve these hurdles for the betterment of future generations. For instance, the globalization and industrialization have destroyed many forests lands to build constructions like industries and modern cities to provide the upgraded facility to the people. However, these destructions of forests have made the greener world into a warmer world which can be seen as global warming.
In conclusion, reversing environmental changes required a lot of money, thus wealthy organizations and governments can afford such projects. Hence, I believe wealthy authorities should take such burden on their shoulders instead of making people responsible for this and for the sake of better future on planet earth, else it will be difficult to survive in coming decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-26 | Parismz | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Gaurav2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | Rajie | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
- People should work a fixed number of hours per week, and employers should not ask anybody to work more than this. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. 56
- Many people are working at home rather than in the workplace. Some people believe this will bring benefits to the workers and their families, but others suggest it will cause stress in the home. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages? 84
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like.Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views an 56
- The best way to reduce the number of traffic accidents is to make all young drivers complete a safe driving education course before being licensed to drive. To what extent do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...volved to make the river water potable. Secondly, modernization by the governmen...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45387453875 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16178675231 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59778597786 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.3440035747 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.222222222 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164483995864 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634822095041 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354780352583 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950553558131 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285468728734 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.