In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that as the job market is increasingly becoming more competitive, applicants are required to have practical skills instead of theoretical knowledge only. Some people even predict that formal qualifications may not be necessary in the future. This essay is going to demonstrate why I partially agree with the opinion through several following reasons.
First of all, practical skills are much more useful in the working environment. Because they are frequently used on a daily basis, skills like teamwork or critical thinking become the inevitable requirements in every job descriptions. A job interview would be a good example for this. Going into a job interview, the applicants will certainly be asked to describe about their past working experience and the skills they have obtained through it. Since theoretical knowledge only serves as a foundation of knowledge and will be easily forgotten if it is not used frequently, the interviewers will unlikely to ask questions regarding to it and only focus on more practical skills instead.
Second, I disagree with the view that in the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. If the candidates can only describe what practical skills they possess without having any proves to support it, the interviewers would find it difficult to assess their true ability. For example, the types of standardized tests like IELTS or SAT tests are useful tools to showcase one's academic ability, proving to the recruiters that they are well-educated people and have full capability for the job positions.
In conclusion, I would say it is more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge, but we also need formal qualifications to support the skills we have demonstrated in the job interviews.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Sagar Gurung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | Tran Mai Phuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | rania sayed ahmed | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | rania sayed ahmed | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | Muhammed_10 | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarise the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Children over 15 should be allowed to make decisions about their lives without the interference of their parents or teachers Society should accept that children mature at a younger age these days and should adjust the law accordingly Do you agree or disag 62
- Some people believe world poverty can be solved by the governments of rich countries giving large amounts of money to the governments of poor countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world.Why is this? What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy? 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29577464789 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06142887499 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545774647887 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7494680827 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366680324679 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139805678004 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109902856102 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240089309511 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590209638277 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.