The pie charts bellow show the comparison of the different kinds of energy production of france in two years
These pie charts given changes in comparison of energy production of France between 1995 and 2005. The data presents in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the higest percentage was coal while the most negative trend was the other.
In the one hand in 1995, coal got 29.80% which the higest category, followed by gas which was 29.63% was the second higest, followed by petro which was 29,27% was the third higest, followed by nuclear which was 6.40% was the fourth higest, and the last followed by other which was 4.90%.
On the other hand in 2005, coal got increase to about 1.13%, it can be seen that from 29.80% to 30.93%. Followed by gas got increment to about 0.68%, it can be seen from 29.63% to 30.31%. And then followed by petro fot experience drastic decline to about 9.72%, it can be seen that from 29.27% to 19.55%. And the next followed by nuclear got ascension to about 3.7%, it can be seen that from 6.40% to 10.10%. And the last followed by other got increase to about 4.2%, it can be seen from 4.90% to 9.10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | CHÚC | view | |
| 2023-07-02 | Risti | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 67
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The pie charts bellow show the comparison of the different kinds of energy production of france in two years 67
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igest percentage was coal while the most negative trend was the other. In the o...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... can be seen that from 6.40% to 10.10%. And the last followed by other got increase...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, then, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51322751323 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12722102448 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439153439153 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2471988693 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0434786332255 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373441030307 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105625073961 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636058718716 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899522866474 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.