Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
On the basis of the evidence currently available, the number of cars in use has been increased since the past few decades. And there has been a topic of debate whether this trend will continue in the future or not. I am in profound agreement that there will be a considerable decrease in cars number in the foreseeable future. Both growing air pollution and improvement of technology prove my point of view.
First and foremost, to diminish the exacerbating air pollution, there is a strong requisition to reduce personal vehicles in use. Every day, the number of people, prone to lung disease is getting more and more because of the pollution, cars emit into the air. and this hazardous pollution will suffer every individual especially children, senile and pregnant women unless the government does something.
for example, in Iran government initiated odd-even traffic policy to limit driving car in crowded places. And still, governors are seeking for every other possible way to lower this number even more. So, by growing air pollution countries are trying varied approaches to diminish the number of cars in the streets in a not too distant future.
Finally, technology affects the number of cars by both a decrease in people's commuting and improvement of public transportation. Technology started to get involved in every aspect of human life and has tried to both make their life easier and save time. That means in the modern world one can lay in the sofa and buy things, pay bills or other daily routine works while drinking his cup of coffee, and there is no need to waste time behind the role waiting for a traffic light. This modernized lifestyle keeps people at their home and reduces car numbers in the streets. Moreover, with the help of technology, the quality of public transportation will increase, and people get encouraged to use for example a high-tech train instead of a personal car in case of receiving better services. Hence, this progressive technology would have out-standing effects on the number of personal cars in not far future.
To summarize, despite the arguments on prediction the number of cars in the future, in my opinion, it is certainly true to say that according to the air pollution we are struggling right now and the developing technology every society is going to meet a considerable car reduction in the city, and the situation would certainly ameliorate by the government's support on the above factors.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 60
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not prefer enough time to help their communities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... the pollution, cars emit into the air. and this hazardous pollution will suffer ev...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...unless the government does something. for example, in Iran government initiated o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76896762356 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54501216545 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8675251868 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.882352941 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1764705882 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103373452498 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356409719202 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326617728438 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597524121118 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228877849386 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.