All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Most companies wanting to find ways to improve their operation efficiency, end up with hiring external consultants. Companies need to eschew depending on suggestions from outside consultants to operate efficiently.
Most companies take less effort in efficient operation management. In hiring external consultants, the direct interaction between employee and employer is plaint: indeed, this results in employees fulminating over decision taken by consultants. There is a commensurate amount of expense towards the outside consultants for their strategies in improving the companies efficiency. When interacting with employee directly, novice employees would be able to concoct ideas and experienced staff would be presenting their experience for improving the companies efficiency.
Although, hearing out employee does conduce positive impact, it has certain downsides. Many decisions and suggestion are not well thought through and could lead to devastating results.
Consequently, companies depending only on outside consultants need to re-think on their strategies. Their own employee could be having vast ideas for improving the efficiency
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...s for their strategies in improving the companies efficiency. When interacting with emplo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...ting their experience for improving the companies efficiency. Although, hearing out em...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, well, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 2235.4752809 44% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 160.0 442.535393258 36% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.2125 5.05705443957 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 4.55969084622 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12147300965 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 215.323595506 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6625 0.4932671777 134% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 704.065955056 41% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8736414554 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327630691082 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140308452163 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981730734996 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204396510143 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113810534902 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.44 12.1639044944 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.