Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Supporting scientific researches only with definite and clear consequences governments will impede the development of probably the most promising investigations.
In the beginning, it should be mentioned that science can be divided into two main types: applied science and fundamental one. And the latter is defined by researches the results of which do not and must not contain obvious practical benefits. So, a lot of disciplines in humanities will suffer in case if the recommendation would be adopted. And whoever knows what philosophers do?
A good friend of mine is a mathematician, so he told me about small groups of scientists who have been working at mathematical theories that seem inapplicable to anything real nowadays. Probably, at the moment we can consider those people a bit crazy, but in the future, such a mathematical apparatus can turn out especially useful and convenient for many purposes. Who knows! If the government does not support them now we can lose a lot in the future.
Let us change the direction to more practical and realistic science as physics. The brilliant and telling example from history is the discovery of electromagnetic induction by Faraday. When asked “What good is it?” he replied: “What good is a newborn baby?”. Can anybody imagine modern life without electricity? Or let us come back to the present time and the recent detections of gravitational waves. For example, I cannot name any potential benefits this discovery gives for a regular population, but no doubt, it is an immense step forward in theoretical physics opening a lot of new possibilities and solving old problems.
Of course, I am not calling for funding every project because some of the researches are part of pseudoscience like astrology. To be sure in scientists' intentions a reliable committee should be organized that helps the government in making decisions. But as I exemplified earlier the rigid adoption of the recommendation can cause dramatic consequences for science.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Vaibhav Panchal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | sayali7 | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | 08sandip | 50 | view |
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Ce 77
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 59
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 58
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine.“A recent study rating 300 male and female advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the exe 63
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager.“Last week, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-t 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 63, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lling for funding every project because some of the researches are part of pseudoscience li...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for example, no doubt, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29813664596 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23707378 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.4932671777 132% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4009903247 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.352941176 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64705882353 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117895331101 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329552448696 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400671477334 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730686128717 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491265714045 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.