In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
The cutting-edge tech of the modern era has not only made life much easier and convenient, but also has greatly reduced the efforts required in many works. One of such area is the agriculture which has flourished immensely, even though; there have been no significant changes in number of starving people of the world. Here, I will be digging up the roots of dilemma and some plausible cures.
As regards to the origin of this mess, the ruling one is presence of multiple intermediaries in the market which help the general public to avail food at their homes or at a specific location. To instantiate, farmers grow food in their fields, sell it to producer, from whom wholesaler and retailers buy the product to vend it consumer. Following the lead is the inflation in the prices of good due to factors like import and export, availability of viver in locality, currency of exchange. However, this makes it very less feasible for impoverish to enjoy the luxury of one basic need of life. A leading example is trade between US and India, in which, latter often bring in provisions not being produced in domestic market and selling unique food of the country to former nation at hefty prices. All these reasons contribute to starvation of population around the world.
Latching onto curatives of the malady, these are actually quite simple with some major and minor drawbacks. The prepotent and most straightforward is to lessen the number of arbitrators from the trade and directly provide food to consumers, although, it might diminish employment opportunities. Therefore, it is never seen in any market or country around the world. The more reasonable one is providing subsidies on the goods to people, respective to their income. For instance, income tax is charged according to earnings of a person in India and if the same can be applied to food subsidies, then certainly, it will be boon for many.
To reiterate, famine is not something which can be cleansed in a one go, it requires some careful and rational steps with the support from every possible person such as researchers, public, authorities, scientists and so on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-07 | tiendung00001 | 56 | view |
- Some people say that people remember special gifts or presents that they receive Why do you think that is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 68
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- In my countries teenagers are encouraged to do part time jobs What s the situation like in out country What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of doing part time job 88
- Some people say that people remember special gifts or presents that they recieve. Why do you think that is? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rmediaries in the market which help the general public to avail food at their homes or at a sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, as regards, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94166666667 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78087466256 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613888888889 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6239995613 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126816082256 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374276355048 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302924364214 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713836089847 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0083018251519 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.