DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COUNTRIES BECOME LESS EVIDENT EACH YEAR. NOWADAYS, ALL OVER THE WORLD, PEOPLE SHARE THE SAME FASHIONS, ADVERTISING, BRANDS, EATING HABITS AND TV CHANNELS. WHAT ARE THE REASONS? DO THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES OF THIS?
Thanks to the globalization in the recent decades, the cultural gaps between nations have been bridged significantly. With a better mutual understanding, citizens are no longer difficult to adopt the unique aspects of the foreign cultures such as eating habits, fashion trend or interior decorations. In my point of view, the benefits of global integration do outnumber the demerits due to several reasons.
To begin with, since the world is incessantly developing, nations will be left obsolete if the Government’s intention is retrogressive and the citizens are not accustomed to the new changes. Also, globalization is not tantamount to entirely replacing the current cultures with the new ones but making respectable intersection to introduce to the world and vice versa. Furthermore, people living in the developing countries are keen to imitate special features from foreign cultures with a view to demonstrating a modern lifestyle
It is firmly believed that globalization is advantageous to people’s lives. Firstly, ground-breaking technologies and the intuitive functions offered from prestigious smartphone giants in Korea or China have facilitated the communication between users regardless of the geographical locations, while electronic facilities such as refrigerators or air conditional from industrialized countries have brought indisputable convenience to citizens from developing nations. Moreover, by signing lucrative contracts with the electronic companies from other countries to build manufacturing factories, employees have obtained sustainable occupations, hence gradually eradicating the poverty in the developing regions.
In conclusion, international integration is inevitable and this trend should be supported on account of its long-term benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | lonbimthoi | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | lonbimthoi | 11 | view |
- SOME PEOPLE THINK IN THE MODERN SOCIETY, INDIVIDUALS ARE BECOMING MORE DEPENDENT THAN EACH OTHER, WHILE OTHERS SAY THAT INDIVIDUALS ARE BECOMING MORE INDEPENDENT. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW, GIVE OPINION? 89
- SOME PEOPLE THINK IT’S NECESSARY TO TRAVEL ABROAD TO LEARN ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES. HOWEVER, OTHER THINK IT’S NOT NECESSARY TO TRAVEL ABROAD BECAUSE ALL OF THE INFORMATION CAN BE SEEN ON TV AND THE INTERNET. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW, OPINION? 100
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT WOMEN SHOULD PLAY AN EQUAL ROLE AS MEN IN COUNTRY’S POLICE OR MILITARY FORCES. OTHERS THINK WOMEN ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR THESE KIND OF JOBS. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE OPINION? 84
- Some people hold that nature places a more important role in people development. However, others believe nurture is the decisive factor. Discuss both views, give opinions. 90
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...view to demonstrating a modern lifestyle It is firmly believed that globalization...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16733067729 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55988970577 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653386454183 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.3325925893 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.0 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0773943753577 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307484664157 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0178151466864 0.0667982634062 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.042106845371 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00994754097301 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.0946893788 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.8 12.4159519038 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.52 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.